By Rick Wayne:
Some 30 years ago, after I had ended my partisan relationship with
the day’s prime minister—largely because of his shocking tolerance of
repeated intolerable behavior on the part of the more influential
members of his party . . . (his own particular proclivities had not yet
come to light)—and had taken to criticizing his policies, I had an
early Saturday morning visitor who invited me for a drive around a
not-yet-awake Castries.
We had barely pulled away from my front door when he said: “How long
have we known each other? Since my law-student days in London? You know
I’m not a violent man. I abhor all kinds of violence. But while reading
your article in this morning’s paper, the thought actually occurred to
me that I should pick up a gun and do Saint Lucia a favor by shooting
the prime minister in the head.”
I laughed, albeit uneasily. How absurd that of all people, Primrose
Bledman, one of the founder members of George Odlum’s ill-fated ‘60s
pressure group the Saint Lucia Forum—whose peace-and-love approaches
often had suggested bald cowardice—was even capable of such thinking.
Besides, the ostensible target of his anger on the morning in question
was among his closest friends!
“It’s not as if what you wrote isn’t true,” he went on. “I share your
views and have actually had several discussions with John concerning
the very things you wrote about today. But you have to remember he is
only one member of the government, one member of his party. What can he
alone do in a democracy?”
“So,” I said, “are you telling me I should say nothing and just let things continue until
such time as is convenient for the prime minister to do what must be done?”
“That’s not what I’m saying,” Primrose reassured me. “Keep on with
what you’re doing. But just be more careful how you state things. Maybe
you don’t realize how inflammable is your writing. A citizen in distress
might not be able to control his emotions after reading you!”
I’ve never forgotten the cautionary words of Primrose Bledman, alas
long ago deceased. Which is not to say I’ve ever made the smallest
effort to express my beliefs with diminished passion, particularly when
they are related to life itself, albeit as we know it in Saint Lucia. To
do so would be as if I were writing about a Forth of July fireworks
display, not an inferno that had eaten up several homes and the lives of
500 hundred citizens, the majority children.
Our Constitution demands that public servants, including politicians, be kept on their
toes and never trusted to do the right thing. The purpose of the laws
governing our public service is to guarantee that the people’s servants
are always accountable to the people. More pointedly, politicians must
never be permitted to believe they can with impunity be lawbreakers,
simply because we the people have given them the authority and the
privilege to be our country’s lawmakers.
It has become a sick joke on the people that time after time we’ve
elected individuals—regardless of reputation—to parliament, mindlessly
trusting them to honor their sworn
undertaking always to put the people first.
Sadly, when our elected officials fall short of the popular
expectation we the people, instead of insisting on remedial action,
endorse their misbehavior, tacitly and otherwise. When there has been
good cause to take legal action against, say, a United Workers Party MP,
his UWP supporters predictably defend him, regardless of how obvious
his guilt.
Same with Labour Party MPs. I should add, by the way, that to date no
Saint Lucian MP has ever been required to answer before a judge and
jury to any charges of malfeasance, despite that our privileged
parliamentarians habitually denounce one another as drug barons, money
launderers, criminals, thieves, abusers of office, child molesters, wife
batterers, blatantly corrupt, nepotistic and even murderers (albeit
subtly).
Whether or not the public issue centers on the misuse of public
funds—as were the branded scandals known as the UN Funds Inquiry,
Rochamel/Frenwell, the
National Provident Fund or the more recent matter of the Councils
Review—Saint Lucians predictably turn on one another, never on the
suspects. All appeals for public accountability are met with the same
arrogant response: “Take me to court!”
The latest episode is almost funny: A local MP, having dismissed all
related reports as innuendo, lies and so on, is faced with evidence
contrary to his assertions. What does he say, this MP who swore on the
Bible always to be accountable to the people?
Incredibly, this was his final shaky reaction: He had retained the
services of a particular lawyer and it would not be right for him to
address the official matter at hand when he was paying someone to speak
on his behalf. Yes, folks, we have come to that!
One more thing: Several weeks ago, an MP who was my friend long
before he lost his mind and decided to become a politician, repeated to
me, almost word for word, Primrose Bledman’s well-intentioned long-ago
advice: “It’s not what you write that bothers me. What you’ve written is
undeniable. You present the evidence. But the way you write what you
write will one of these days cause somebody to shoot a politician. I
hope you can live with that!”
On the other hand, if I’ve learned anything since Bledman’s expressed
concern it is this: As much as I pray it never happens, I truly believe
that should my friend’s prediction come to pass it won’t be because of
how graphically I told the truth but rather because living passively
with the nightmare that has long passed for politics in Saint Lucia was
for one individual no longer possible. I dare to say, furthermore, that
what happened to Baby Doc, Saddam and Gadaffi, Mubarek and others of
their ilk was not as a result of verifiable reporting but because there
came a point when their victimized people decided they’d suffered
enough!
No comments:
Post a Comment